Train
Qwen3.8 27B, post-trained with RL on your workflow data. It learns your job, not the internet's.
Mean NLL by step · qwen3.8-27b · LoRA r16 · 3 epochs
open models, trained on your work
Replace your expensive AI API with an open model trained on your work. Proven before it ships.
how it works
custom models
We test candidate models on your workflow, then train and serve a custom model when the results justify it.
Qwen3.8 27B, post-trained with RL on your workflow data. It learns your job, not the internet's.
Mean NLL by step · qwen3.8-27b · LoRA r16 · 3 epochs
Held-out evals against GPT-5.6 Sol on your real tasks. It ships only when the results support it.
Held-out eval · 200 rows / arm · 95% CI
Served on our managed stack at $0.40/$3 per 1M tokens. Sol is $5/$30.
140ms
75tok/s
94.9%
10×cheaper
qwen3.8-27b · managed serving · last 24h
Shadow traffic proves the model is operationally sound. Endpoint A/B tests the result with the same URL and keys. No client release is required to ramp or roll back.
live traffic
one endpoint95%control
gpt-5.6-sol5%variant
qwen3.8-27b · tunedSame endpoint, API, and keys · shadow mirrors traffic with responses discarded
case 1
The customer ran an agentic workflow on a frontier API to write research reports. We trained an open model to write the same reports, from the same evidence, behind the same release checks, in one call.1
| 30 days | tokens | |
|---|---|---|
| frontier workflow | $130,328 | 14.790B |
| trained model (est.) | $4,604 | 4.843B |
| change (estimated) | -96.5% | |
The trained model is running in shadow. Cost only; latency not compared.2
It passed 402 of 402 QA checks and scored 0.990 on semantic review, where a judge model checks each claim against the evidence (frontier workflow: 0.985).
read the full case 1 →what you keep
next